Legal Opinion

Wainwright v. Weske

California Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1889No. 12436PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new-trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the -court.

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

The complaint herein sets forth this state of facts: That on or about the 21st of April, 1884, the plaintiff was the owner of one half interest in a certain liquor business carried on in the city and county of San Francisco under the firm name of Wainwright & Hey, and the holder of ten thousand dollars in promissory notes against said firm; the Wainwright of this firm was the plaintiff; that on or about said 21st of April the defendant was the owner of ten shares of the *194capital stock of a corporation, the Golden Age Mill Company, doing business in the city and county aforesaid; «, that on or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burton v. StewartNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  2. Hestres v. BrennanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sonnesyn v. AkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Fountain v. Semi-Tropic Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Wainscott v. Occidental Building & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Tower v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Merrill v. MerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API