Legal Opinion
State v. Lane
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 6, 1998No. CX-97-127Published
1Opinion of the Court
582 N.W.2d 256 (1998)
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,
v.
Milo David LANE, Jr., petitioner, Appellant.
No. CX-97-127.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
August 6, 1998.
John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Bradford S. Delapena, Assistant State Public Defender, Minneapolis, for Appellant.
Hubert H. Humphrey III, Attorney General, St. Paul, Michael O. Freeman, Hennepin County Attorney, Linda M. Freyer, Assistant County Attorney, Minneapolis, for Respondent.
Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.
OPINION
BLATZ, Chief Justice.
The appeal of Milo David Lane, Jr., arises from his conviction for simple…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. KroutCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Van Buren v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. KraushaarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.