Legal Opinion

Comeau v. Currier

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 5, 1993No. 92-P-534PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPorada, J.

The plaintiffs, Eugene Comeau (Eugene) and Charlene Comeau (Charlene), husband and wife, brought a tort action in the Superior Court against the defendants, Robert Currier and Steven Cruz, claiming damages from an assault and battery committed upon Eugene by the defendants. After trial, the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs, awarding Eugene $195,300 in damages for the assault and battery and Charlene, $6,200 in damages for loss of consortium. The defendants appeal, claiming that the judge erred in failing to instruct the jury that provocation could be considered in mitigation of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. International Fidelity Insurance v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Feltch v. General Rental Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  4. Morgan v. LalumiereMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  5. Grant v. Lewis/Boyle, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. MedeirosMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  2. Wahlstrom v. JPA IV Management Co., Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
  3. Burns v. Defelice Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API