Legal Opinion

Julia Ribaudo Senior Services v. Department of Public Welfare

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 2009No. 20 WAP 2008PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice TODD.

In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether a Department of Public Welfare (“DPW”) notice of adjudication that clearly advised the recipient, Julia Ribaudo Senior Services (“JRSS”), of the starting and ending dates of the applica*645ble appeal period, but did not specifically designate the date stamped on the notice as the notice’s mailing date, was sufficient to trigger the start of the appeal period. For the following reasons, we reverse the Commonwealth Court’s determination that the notice was inadequate in this regard.

The underlying facts and procedural history of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Criss v. WiseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. PiperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Luckenbach v. LUCKENBACHSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Schmidt v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Hanna v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Armstrong County Memorial Hospital v. Department of Public Welfare of PennsylvaniaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Pennsylvania Bankers Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Department of BankingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. D.C. v. Department of Human ServicesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. A.S. v. Office for Dispute Resolution (Quakertown Community School District)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. In re Appeal of P-Ville AssociatesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API