Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Ludwig

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1988No. 60,440, 60,705PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, J.:

These consolidated appeals arise from litigation concerning the ownership of certain joint tenancy accounts. More specifically, we are asked to determine the legal effect of the actions by one joint tenant in causing additional names to be added to the original joint tenancy accounts. Essentially, the trial court held that the addition of more persons did not destroy the nature of the joint tenancy ownership but made the accounts four-party joint tenancy ownership rather than the original two-party joint tenancy ownership. On appeal from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Simonich v. WiltSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  2. Malone v. SullivanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  3. In Re Estate of SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  4. Edwards v. LedfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  5. Johnson v. Capitol Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Paul v. MontsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  2. Boyle v. HarriesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996
  3. M & I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. HigdonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  4. Lewis A. Paul v. T. Conrad Monts, Donald W. Bostwick, Trustee of International Plastics, Inc. v. Travenca Development Corporation, Also Known as Transnational Venture-Capital Development Corporation Titan Energy Co., Ltd. T. Conrad Monts the Southwest National Bank Southern Investors Management Co., Inc. Farmers Home AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API