Legal Opinion

Western Coal Traffic League v. Interstate Commerce Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 22, 1984No. Nos. 82-1837, 82-1902, 82-1903, 82-2475, 82-2489, 82-2517, 83-1059 and 83-1061PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GINSBURG.

GINSBURG, Circuit Judge:

In these requests for review of Interstate Commerce Commission (Commission or ICC) dispositions, petitioners urge us to look behind the two standard-applying decisions addressed in their petitions: Ex Parte No. 415, Railroad Cost of Capital — 1981, 365 I.C.C. 734 (1982), and Ex Parte No. 439, Railroad Revenue Adequacy — 1981 Determination, 47 Fed.Reg. 52,-237 (1982). Petitioners train their fire on an earlier, standard-setting rulemaking, Ex Parte No. 393, Standards for Railroad Revenue Adequacy, 364 I.C.C. 803…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Functional Music, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Functional Music, Inc. v. United States of America, Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  2. Expert Electric, Inc. v. LevineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. Jorgensen v. York Ice MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  4. Burlington Northern Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Aluminum Company of America v. Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit System, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  2. Qwest Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  3. Western Coal Traffic League v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Association of American Railroads, Intervenor. American Paper Institute, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Association of American Railroads, Intervenor. Carolina Power & Light Company, and Virginia Electric and Power Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Association of American Railroads, Intervenor. Carolina Power & Light Company, and South Carolina Electric & Gas Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Association of American Railroads, Intervenor. Duke Power Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Virginia Electric and Power Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company, Gulf Power Company, Mississippi Power Company, and Southern Company Services, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Edison Electric Institute v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  4. Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit System, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API