Legal Opinion

State v. Owens

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided December 1, 1953No. 22 and 97PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Layton, J.:

A statute of this nature is valid provided only that it is made applicable to a fourth offense committed subsequent to its passage. Gryger v. Burke, Warden, 334 U. S. 728, 68 S. Ct. 1256, 92 L. Ed. 1683; Wilson v. U. S., 9 Cir., 205 F. 2d 567; Cases v. U. S., Cir., 131 F. 2d 916.

But the application of a statute increasing the punishment for a crime, after the commission of that crime, is ex post facto and, thus, unconstitutional hy virtue of Article I, Section 10 of the Federal Constitution. 1 Lindsey v. State of Washington, 301 U. S. 397, 57 S. Ct. 797, 81 L. Ed. 1182; U. S. v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gryger v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Lindsey v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Cases v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1942
  4. People v. D'A PhilippoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. State v. DreauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McDuell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  2. Oney v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  3. Gibbs v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API