Legal Opinion

Daniel L. Campbell v. Snap-On Tools Corporation, James E. Brownfield v. Snap-On Tools Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 9, 1991No. 90-1625WM, 90-1626WMPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In these two cases, consolidated on appeal, plaintiffs Daniel L. Campbell and James E. Brownfield appeal the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgments in favor of their common defendant, Snap-On Tools Corporation. We affirm.

Each plaintiff was a non-exclusive Snap-On Tools dealer pursuant to an “Authorized Dealer Agreement.” Each agreement provided that either party could terminate at any time on ninety days notice, with or without cause. Campbell and Brownfield each terminated his dealership and sued to recover his losses and lost income as a dealer. The district court concluded that each…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Estrin Construction Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Charles Woods Television Corp. v. Capital Cities/abc, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  3. Heath v. SpitzmillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Tilton v. WoodsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Colorcon, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API