Lacambacal v. Vasquez
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 * * * 5 Lloyd Lacambacal, Case No. 2:24-cv-01759-GMN-DJA 6 Plaintiff, 7 Order v. 8 Desteney Vasquez; Fernando; Q Automotive, 9 Defendants. 10 11 Under
28 U.S.C. § 1915
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and has requested 12 authority to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff also submitted a complaint. (ECF 13 No. 1-1). Because the Court finds that Plaintiff’s application is complete, it grants the application 14 to proceed in forma pauperis. However, because the Court finds that Plaintiff’s complaint does 15 not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.