Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Alvarez

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 23, 1986No. 6832-3-IIIPublished

1Dissent

McInturff, A.C.J.

(dissenting)—I dissent. The principal issue of this case is credibility. While I agree with the majority's conclusion credibility must be decided by the jury, the evidence of this case, even under the test announced in State v. Green, 94 Wn.2d 216, 221, 616 P.2d 628 (1980), demands reversal of the conviction. This conclusion is based on facts supported by the record, which differ significantly from the facts noted in the majority opinion.

The majority states Popo's statement "[w]e came to kill you", made immediately prior to the homicides, was corroborated by another witness.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. United States v. Roland W. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API