Commonwealth v. Fontana

PRICE, Judge:

This appeal arises from imposition of sentence following appellant’s conviction by a jury of tampering with a witness,1 receiving stolen goods,2 misapplication of entrusted property,3 and criminal conspiracy.4 On appeal, appellant contends that trial counsel was ineffective5 and that there was insufficient evidence to support his convictions. We find these assertions to be without merit, and we accordingly affirm.

Appellant’s indictment grew out of a grand jury investigation of the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT), District 1-4, authorized by the Honorable John…