People v. Nappi

The People argue that the court below erred in holding that subdivision (c) of section 1180 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law was unconstitutionally vague and indefinite ; that the evidence was legally sufficient to prove defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and so created a question of fact; and that this court has jurisdiction to reverse the court below and order a new trial.

The County Court said that “ The wording of section 1180(c) lacks standards as to what is reasonable and prudent under a given set of circumstances and is too vague to have validity.” Appellant argues that “…