Legal Opinion
United States v. John A. Hickey Mamie Tang
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 9, 1999No. 98-10305PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
The principal issue is whether we have jurisdiction over an interlocutory criminal appeal by the United States. The government seeks to appeal the district court’s order refusing to unseal the criminal defendants’ financial affidavits, which the defendants were required to file in support of their request for court-appointed counsel. We hold that we lack jurisdiction because the appeal does not fall within the statutory rule that only final judgments are ap-pealable, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, within the limited exceptions for interlocutory criminal appeals by the government,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Company Doe v. Public CitizenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Alfonso Labrada Gurolla, United States of America v. Jose Reyes Ortega-Gonzalez, United States of America v. Manuel Barraza LeonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Holy Land Foundation for Relief & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- In Re Copley Press, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Philip E. Watson and Shane E. O'HearnCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.