Legal Opinion

Wright v. . the City of Wilmington

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1885PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Civil. ACTION tried at December Term, 1884, of the Superior Court of New Hanover county, before Avery, Judge, and a Tu7- "Verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs, and appeal by the defendant. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The corporate authorities of Wilmington, with a view to the improvement of one of the streets of the city, known as Nutt street, and for the greater convenience of such as should have occasion for its use, caused it to be raised and graded, without, as the plaintiffs allege and the jury find, opening sufficient side gutters or drains to convey away the superabundant waters produced by a heavy rain-fall, and protect the adjoining proprietors from an overflow. The plaintiffs owned and operated a steam mill for grinding grain on one side of the street, which, by the reason of the filling up the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bunch v. Town of EdentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. American Brewing Ass'n v. TalbotSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  3. Emery v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  4. State v. Adams.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Steelman v. City of New BernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API