Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Boatmen's National Bank

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 13, 1941PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHays, J.

Respondent, an attorney at law, exhibited in the probate court of the City of St. Louis a demand against the estate of Hugh W. Thomasson, deceased, for legal services alleged to have been rendered by him to decedent in connection with .the defense of an insanity proceeding in the circuit court of the City of St. Louis. The probate court disallowed the demand; but, on appeal to the circuit court, a trial to a jury resulted in a verdict for respondent in the sum of $10,000, and from the judgment entered thereon Thomasson’s administrator pendente lite has appealed. For convenience we will speak…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. Swedish-American National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  2. Miller v. CollinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Donaldson v. Eaton & EstesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. Majors v. MaloneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  5. McInnis v. St. Louis-Southern, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Mash v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  2. Rothe v. HullSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  3. State v. GordenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  4. Holtz v. Daniel Hamm Drayage Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  5. State v. WeltyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API