Legal Opinion

Raymond Smedley v. Temple Drilling Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 21, 1986No. 85-3320PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLARK, Chief Judge:

Defendant/appellant Temple Drilling Company appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs/appellees Cynthia and Raymond Smedley, Jr. in the amount of $397,-300. The judgment enforced a settlement agreement reached between the attorney for the Smedleys and the attorney retained by Crawford & Company, Temple’s insurance adjuster. The district court found that Crawford & Company had apparent authority to settle on behalf of Temple or, alternatively, that Temple’s actions ratified any unauthorized conduct on Crawford’s part. We affirm.

I

The facts are largely undisputed.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Mid-South Towing Company v. Har-Win, Inc. v. Okc Corporation Liquidating TrustCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  3. Cia Anon Venezolana De Navegacion v. Frank L. Harris and Pate Stevedoring Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. United States v. TexasDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1981
  5. St. Amand v. Marriott Hotel, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Principal Mutual Life Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. Gisclair v. Tug Chantel Naquin, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1988
  3. Edwards v. Born, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API