Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Ledbetter v. Pitts, Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 17, 1928No. 17041PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, C.
The one question necessary to a determination of this controversy here for review is the constitutionality of chapter 36, Session Laws of Oklahoma, 1925.
An incidental question relates to a motion to dismiss the appeal, upon the ground that the question has become moot. In support of the motion to dismiss, defendant in error relies on a statement in the brief of plaintiff in error wherein it is stated that the defendant in error is proceeding to do the thing which plaintiff in error, through this proceeding, is seeking by mandamus to compel the county treasurer to do or perform.
We do…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Dorchy v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Pottawatomie County v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Holcomb v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Comanche Light Power Co. v. Nix, SheriffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Excise Board, Washita County v. LowdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Wallace v. GassawaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Smith Engineering Works v. CusterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma State Highway Commission v. HornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Walker v. Local Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.