Legal Opinion

State v. Castro

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 28, 1976No. 75 2863, CA 5357PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.

Defendant was convicted by the court, after jury waiver, of illegal possession of narcotics. ORS 167.207. He appeals, assigning as error the receipt of testimony of Officer Sharp and also the denial of his motion made during trial to renew his previously heard and denied motion to suppress the evidence seized at the time of his arrest. If we correctly understand defendant’s contentions both here and before the trial court, the basis of the appeal is defendant’s contention that the state failed to comply with discovery rights authorized by ORS 135.805 to 135.873.

Specifically, defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WolfeOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  3. State v. HandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Automotive Emporium, Inc. v. MurchisonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. State v. AddicksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. State v. SarrattCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. State Ex Rel. Automotive Emporium, Inc. v. MurchisonOregon Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API