Legal Opinion

Brook v. Carey

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 6, 2009No. 08-16966PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Ronald Dwane Brook appeals pro se a judgment entered after a four-day jury trial in his civil rights action alleging prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs. We affirm.

DISCUSSION

1. Dismissal of State Law Claim

The district court properly dismissed Brook’s claim that prison officials violated California Civil Code § 52.1. That statute provides for a civil action against any individual who “interferes by threats, intimidation, or coercion” with “rights secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States.” See Nelson v. City of Irvine, 143 F.3d 1196,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Palmer v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Corales v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Nugget Hydroelectric, L.P. v. Pacific Gas and Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Nelson v. City of IrvineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. (PC) Rabb v. FigueroaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  2. (PC) Torres v. QuickDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  3. Dean v. ZhangDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
  4. Rust v. FernandezDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API