Rautenberg v. Munnis
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
This is a motion by the plaintiffs for a new trial in an action to determine a boundary line. The case has twice been before this court, Rautenberg v. Munnis, 107 N. H. 446; Rautenberg v. Munnis, 108 N. H. 20. After the last cited opinion was handed down the motion for a new trial referred to in tire first was heard by the Superior Court ( Grant; J.) and denied.
The motion is founded upon the discovery of new evidence, in the form of a plan dated 1902, which the plaintiffs allege “clearly indicates that the boundary line ... is as claimed by the petitioners.” The Trial Court found that the…
2Cited by11 opinions
- State v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- Neeley v. KelschUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. AbbottSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Carbonneau v. Town of RyeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Burroughs v. WynnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.