Legal Opinion
Essence Communications, Inc. v. Singh Industries, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 22, 1988No. 88 Civ. 8345 (RWS)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff Essence Communications, Inc. (“ECI”) has moved by Order to Show Cause for a preliminary injunction pursuant to Rule 65 Fed.R.Civ.P. restraining defendants Singh Industries, Inc., Singh Corporation, Diamond Essence Company and Celestial Creations, Inc. (collectively “Singh”) from using the names “Diamond Essence Company,” “Diamond Essence,” “Ruby Essence,” “Sapphire Essence,” “Emerald Essence” or “Diamond Essence Retail Gallery,” claiming that such use infringes upon ECI’s trademarks. Upon the findings and conclusions set forth below, the motion for a…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Abercrombie & Fitch Company v. Hunting World, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- McGregor-Doniger Inc. v. Drizzle Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Thompson Medical Company, Inc. v. Pfizer Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Gruner + Jahr USA Publishing v. Meredith Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- The Sports Authority, Inc. v. Prime Hospitality Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Braun Inc. And Braun Aktiengesellschaft, Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. Dynamics Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Hypnotic Hats, Ltd. v. Wintermantel Enters., LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Merriam-Webster, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Random House, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.