A. N. Khouri & Bro. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Sullivan, Judge:
The subjects of these protests consist of eleven ornamental glass articles. The collector of customs at the port of New York classified them under paragraph 218 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as “all articles of every description not specially provided for, composed wholly or in chief value of glass, blown * * * or colored, cut, engraved, etched * * * or decorated or ornamented in any manner,” and assessed duty thereon as such at 60 per centum ad valorem.
They are claimed dutiable at 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1547 of the same act as “Works of art, including * * *…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. OlivottiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- United States v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
3Cited by2 opinions
- Paternostro v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
- Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950