Legal Opinion

Paternostro v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 2, 1941No. C. D. 486PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cline, Judge:

On April 7, 1941, the court rendered decision in this case (C. D. 463), but, finding error therein, the court of its own motion, hereby amends the decision to read as follows:

This is a suit against the United States in which the plaintiff seeks to recover a part of the duty assessed on certain paintings which were returned at the rate of 35 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1413 of the Tariff Act of 1930. It is claimed in the protest that the articles are dutiable at 15 per centum ad valorem by virtue of paragraph 1547 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the British…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Tutton v. VitiSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. American Colortype Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  4. United States v. China & Japan Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1893
  5. A. N. Khouri & Bro. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Forest Lawn Memorial-Park v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  2. Fusek's v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  3. Protest 34266-K/89429 of PaternostroUnited States Customs Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API