Legal Opinion

Hackler v. Ingram

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 13, 1917No. 1178PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyce, J.

Appellee, Ingram, sued appellant, Hackler, for damages alleged to have resulted from negligence in the performance of an operation upon appellee’s wife, and subsequent treatment of her. The negligence alleged, generally stated, was that appellant, who was a physician and surgeon, in performing an operation on Mrs. Ingrám about May 15, 1912, was negligent in leaving a skin needle sewed up in Mrs. Ingram’s side where the operation had been performed, and in subsequently failing to remove the same; Appellant answered by general denial and specially that he had proper training and skill and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Samuels v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  3. Baker v. HancockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Degnan v. RansomNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McKinney v. TromlyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  2. Moore v. IveyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Green v. ShawSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  4. Giesenschlag v. ValentaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  5. Dudley v. HospitalWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API