Legal Opinion
Genentech, Inc. v. Amgen, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 29, 2002No. 01-1098PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
On summary judgment, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California determined that Amgen, Inc. (Amgen) did not literally infringe Genentech, Inc.’s (Genentech’s) U.S. Patent Nos. 4,704,362 (the '362 patent), 5,221,619 (the '619 patent), and 5,583,013 (the '013 patent). Gen-entech, Inc. v. Amgen, Inc., No. C 96-03752 WHA, slip op. at 1-2 (N.D.Cal. Oct. 12, 2000) (Amended Summary Judgment Order). The district court also barred Genentech from proceeding on a theory of infringement under the doctrine of equivalents. Id. Because the district court did not…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Vivid Technologies, Inc. v. American Science & Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Garrett v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- The Johns Hopkins University, Baxter Healthcare Corporation and Becton Dickinson and Company v. Cellpro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Dsu Medical Corporation v. Jms Co., LtdCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Mortgage Grader, Inc. v. First Choice Loan Services Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Pacing Technologies, LLC v. Garmin International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- State of Texas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- United States v. ShraderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.