Legal Opinion

People v. Klammer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1904No. Docket No. 191PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from St. Glair; Tappan, J. Otto Klammer was convicted of larceny from a burning building.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Respondent was convicted under section 11551, 3 Comp. Laws, which provides that, “every person who shall commit the offense of larceny by stealing in any building that is on fire, shall be punished,” etc. The *400information charged the respondent with the larceny of one open-faced ladies’ watch and one ladies’ chain, of the value of twelve dollars, of ¿he goods, chattels, and property of, and in the possession of, one Sarah McMillan, from; the residence of the said Sarah McMillan, No. 2,721. Wright street, Port Huron, * * * the same being-then and there on fire.”

The court instructed the jury…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. City of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. People v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. President of the Farmers' Turnpike Road v. CoventryNew York Supreme Court · 1813
  4. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  5. In re LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Coca-Cola Bott. Co. of Ark. v. Coca-Cola Bott. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  2. Town of Newton v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. People of Michigan v. Kathleen Louise WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Esso Standard Oil Co. v. CRESCENT RIVER PORT P. ASS'NSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  5. Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Crescent River Port Pilots Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API