Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Crescent River Port Pilots Ass'n
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion
On Rehearing
HAWTHORNE, Justice.
We granted a rehearing in this case in order to give further thought to the respective duties and jurisdictions of these two groups of pilots. After much deliberation we have decided that the district judge who heard this case arrived at the correct solution of the problem, and we are so impressed by the reasons which he gave for his judgment that we have decided to adopt them as our own.
“This is a suit for declaratory judgment,” he wrote, “and injunctive relief brought by Esso Standard Oil Company against Crescent River Port Pilots Association and New Orleans…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Union Pacific Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- United States v. Alabama Great Southern RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- State Ex Rel. Fitzpatrick v. GraceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Managua Nav. Co. v. Aktieselskabet BorgestadCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1925
- Wabash R. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.