Legal Opinion

Ray v. United States

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 6, 2014No. Case No. 2:12-cv-677Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion and Order

JAMES L. GRAHAM, District Judge.

This tax case concerns the “foster care payments” exclusion from gross income. See 26 U.S.C. § 131. In general, when a taxpayer receives payments from the State to provide foster care to an individual who lives in the taxpayer’s home, the taxpayer may exclude those payments from gross income. This case involves the meaning of “foster care” when the recipient of care is older than age 18. The question presented in this case is whether the § 131 exclusion is available if the taxpayer providing care is the biological parent or guardian of a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Dominguez v. Correctional Medical ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API