Legal Opinion

Harper v. Holman

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided October 25, 1897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

This was a bill in equity, which averred the following facts: Upon returning from a voyage of discovery, known as the “Norwegian Polar Expedition,” in 189(5, Dr. Fridtjof Nansen prepared a book relating to his voyage, and illustrated the same with many photographs taken in the course of the expedition.

Read the full summary

This was a bill in equity, which averred the following facts: Upon returning from a voyage of discovery, known as the “Norwegian Polar Expedition,” in 189(5, Dr. Fridtjof Nansen prepared a book relating to his voyage, and illustrated the same with many photographs taken in the course of the expedition. This book was written in Norwegian, and was entitled “Farthest North, Being a Record of a Voyage of Exploration of the Ship Fram, 1893-1896, and of a Fifteen Months’ Sleigh Journey by Dr. Nansen and Lieut. Johansen.” Dr. Nansen sold and assigned this work, together with the illustrations, to…

1Opinion of the Court

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

Sixteen causes of demurrer have been assigned to this hill of complaint; but, upon the argument, counsel, considerately assenting that it was unnecessary to burden1 the court *223with all the questions thus raised, agreed that all but the first four assignments should be considered as withdrawn, upon the understanding that the complainants would have leave to move to amend as they might be advised, and that the defendants would be at liberty to renew any of their present objections to the bill, except those now passed upon, and such of them, if any, as should be met and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Bedsole v. . MonroeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1848
  3. Jaros Hygienic Underwear Co. v. Fleece Hygienic Underwear Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1894
  4. Union Switch & Signal Co. v. Philadelphia & R. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adam v. FolgerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
  2. Dennison Mfg. Co. v. Thomas Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Delaware · 1899
  3. Commodores Point Terminal Co. v. HudnallDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1922
  4. Bracken v. RosenthalU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1907
  5. Sayre v. McGill Ticket Punch Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API