Callaghan v. Callaghan

The libelant urges that the denial of the divorce was contrary to the weight of the evidence and should be set aside. The Trial Court found that the libelee did not treat the libelant as seriously to injure her health or endanger her reason. The findings of the Trial Court are binding where there is evidence to support them. Ballou v. Ballou, 95 N. H. 105; Cote v. Cote, 94 N. H. 372, 373; Johnson v. Johnson, 80 N. H. 15. “The Trial Judge could disbelieve the libelant’s testimony, believe the libelee’s, and enter the decree which he did.” Ballou v. Ballou, supra; Franklyn v. Franklyn, 93 N. H.…