Osama Al Ramahi v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IKUTA, Circuit Judge:
Osama AI Ramahi and Nisreen AI Sharif petition for review of the decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that extraordinary circumstances do not excuse their untimely applications for asylum. We deny the petition because substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that, even assuming the petitioners could demonstrate extraordinary circumstances, they did not file their applications within a “reasonable period given those circumstances.” 8 C.F.R. § 1208.4(a)(5).
I
We begin by examining the statutory framework that governs the timeliness of asylum…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Department of Justice, Attorney General Alberto R. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Wakkary v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Neama El Sayed Ramadan Gaser Hesham El Gendy v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- ACEIJAS-QUIROZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2014
- Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Pattie Walcott v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Fabian-Soriano v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.