Legal Opinion

Bassil v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 13, 1986No. 84-361PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*715NEWMAN, Associate Judge:

Bassil asserts that his conviction for the second-degree murder while armed of Richard Petty and assault with intent to rob James Green while armed must be reversed. He urges that the trial court denied his right to present a defense, by ruling, that as a matter of law, evidence of the bad reputation for truth and veracity of a government witness was inadmissible.1 We conclude that the trial court’s ruling constitutes constitutional error but find it harmless beyond a reasonable doubt; we affirm.

I

Viewed in its light most favorable to the government, the evidence…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Shepard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Newman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Clayborne v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Clark v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. McCarthy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API