Legal Opinion

Odom v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 3, 1934No. 3567PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal in a war risk insurance ease. Insured is admittedly suffering now from paralysis agitans. He was brought baek from Europe with a company of wounded men; and the evidence justifies the inference that he was suffering from paralysis agitans at the time of his discharge from the army. He testifies that from the time of his discharge he has been physically unable to work. His testimony with regard to this is corroborated by several witnesses, and no work record is shown to nullify this testimony. There is testimony of experts to the effect that paralysis agitans is a permanent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Garrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
  2. Carter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
  3. Hicks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
  4. United States v. SaulsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
  5. United States v. MessingerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. TrollingerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
  2. Muth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  3. United States v. CowardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  4. United States v. HooperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API