Legal Opinion

City of Chariton v. Holliday

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 18, 1882PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Dacas District Oowrt. Action to recover for sidewalks constructed by the plaintiff, on a street in front of the defendant’s premises. Trial to the court, judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.

1. cities and walks • rede" luüon'to con-" struct. I. As to the North Street sidewalh. The city council passed an ordinance, general in its character, providing that the council might, “by resolution ° ° . ad°Pte<l ny three-fourths of the council, direct or or(ier building or repairing of any sidewalk on Wy 0f £pe sfcreets or alleys of the city.” The ordinance provided: “ Whenever any such improvement is ordered, a copy of the resolution shall be served by the marshal upon each known property holder along the street * * upon which such improvement is to be made,” and “in case the owner or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Burlington v. QuickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kerker v. BocherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Clifton Land Co. v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. Wingert v. SnoufferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Zalesky v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Dittoe v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API