Legal Opinion
Barkshadt v. Gresham
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided July 5, 1922No. 10937PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. ChiEE Justice Gary.
This is an action for damages to the plaintiff’s horse, sustained in a collision with the defendant’s automobile.
The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, for $175, and the defendant appealed upon two exceptions, the first of which is as- follows:
“(I) That his Honor erred in charging the jury that a person situated in a position of sudden peril is held to the standard of ordinary prudence; whereas his Honor should have charged the jury that a person so situated is only required to exercise his best judgment under the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Banchs v. Humberto ColónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
- Porter v. CookSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
- Gravel v. RobergeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1926
- Lancaster v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Banchs v. ColónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963