Legal Opinion

Lancaster v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 31, 1941PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

This appeal presents one question: Should the trial court have allowed defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit ?

The injury to plaintiff occurred in the State of South Carolina from causes operating in that State, and, except for procedural law of the forum not here challenged, the South Carolina law applies. Howard v. Howard, 200 N. C., 574, 158 S. E., 101; Hipps v. R. R., 177 N. C., 472, 99 S. E. (S. C.), 18.

The vast development of travel and traffic by motor vehicles, greatly multiplying the dangers incident to the use of highways and streets, and the necessity of regulation looking…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Hinnant v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Beach v. . PattonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. Howard v. . HowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hall v. Coble Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Evans v. . Rockingham Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Price v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Price v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Rattley v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API