Fox v. Grace
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CARNEY, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The superior court denied a father's motion to modify custody because it did not believe it had subject matter jurisdiction under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) to modify an Oregon custody order. 1 The father appeals, arguing that the superior court erred in failing to consider the controlling statute that governs the court's jurisdiction to modify an out-of-state order.
We agree. The controlling statute, AS 25.30.320, allows the superior court to modify an out-of-state custody order if it "determines that neither the child,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Esch v. Superior Court of the State of Alaska, Third Judicial DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Alaska State Employees Ass'n v. Alaska Public Employees Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Robertson v. RiplettAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Kollander v. KollanderAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lance Pruitt v. State of Alaska, Division of Elections, and Lt. Gov. Kevin Meyer and Director Gail Fenumiai, in their Official Capacities and Elizabeth Hodges Snyder, IntervenorAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
- Jason Mouritsen v. Julia Mouritsen, n/k/a Julia TaubertAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
- Kenneth John Christensen v. Songul SeckinAlaska Supreme Court · 2021