Legal Opinion

Diaz v. Van Norman

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided January 5, 2005No. 2:04-cv-74879PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER OF SUMMARY DISMISSAL

COHN, District Judge.

I

This is a pro se civil rights complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). This Court has granted Plaintiffs application to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

Plaintiff is a federal prisoner currently confined at the McCreary United States Penitentiary in Pine Knot, Kentucky. In his complaint, Plaintiff states that he is a Mexican citizen and alleges that state and federal…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. HallDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. GautreauxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  3. Arivett v. ChildressDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
  4. Bridges v. Mental Health OfficerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
  5. Kinchloe v. BidenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API