Legal Opinion

Krembs v. City of Merrill

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVinje, C. J.

Sec. 70.31yStats., requires a separate assessment of each owner’s shares of stock on the tax roll. This *244was not done. The total number of bank shares, 1,000, were valued together and assessed at $100,000. But such irregularity in the assessment did not affect the groundwork of the tax or operate to do injustice to any one. The assessment was easily separable, and plaintiff in bringing his action for a refund has found no difficulty in arriving at the correct amount of the assessment of the stock he represents. Such -mere irregularity in the assessment does not invalidate the tax. An action…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Merchants' Nat. Bank of Richmond v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. State ex rel. Second Ward Savings Bank v. LeuchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. City of La CrosseCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  2. Whitbeck v. Wisconsin Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API