Legal Opinion

Whitbeck v. Wisconsin Tax Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1932PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed December 8, 1931:

Rosenberry, C. J.

For reasons hereinafter stated, we do not reach the principal contention argued by the parties to this litigation. It is considered, therefore, that a statement of the various contracts entered into is unnecessary to a determination of this case. The principal question *60argued here involves a determination with reference to a federal question. A decision either way, in view of the fact that the question is not necessary to a decision of the case, would prevent either party from having the matter reviewed by the United States…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. City of NewportSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Leathe v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Straus v. Wisconsin Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Krembs v. City of MerrillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Milwaukee County v. DorsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Fawsett v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
  3. Simmons Co. v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Turneaure v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Elwell v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API