Whitbeck v. Wisconsin Tax Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed December 8, 1931:
Rosenberry, C. J.
For reasons hereinafter stated, we do not reach the principal contention argued by the parties to this litigation. It is considered, therefore, that a statement of the various contracts entered into is unnecessary to a determination of this case. The principal question *60argued here involves a determination with reference to a federal question. A decision either way, in view of the fact that the question is not necessary to a decision of the case, would prevent either party from having the matter reviewed by the United States…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. City of NewportSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Leathe v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Straus v. Wisconsin Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Krembs v. City of MerrillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by9 opinions
- Milwaukee County v. DorsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Fawsett v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
- Simmons Co. v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Turneaure v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Elwell v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.