Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Discip. Proceedings Against Penn

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1996No. 95-0536-DPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

We review the recommendation of the referee that the license of David V. Penn to practice law in Wisconsin be suspended for two years as discipline for the following professional misconduct. While serving as Vilas county district attorney from 1987 through 1992, Attorney Penn used marijuana and cocaine, for which he was subsequently convicted, and acted as district attorney in respect to referral and prosecution of nine persons who had used an illegal drug with him or had personal knowledge of his illegal drug use. In late 1993 and early 1994, Attorney Penn's use of marijuana and cocaine…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel W. Johns, Jr.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  2. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proc. Against PennWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Brett R. BlommeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
  4. In Re Disciplinary Proceedings RadcliffeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  5. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proc. Against PennWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API