Legal Opinion

State v. Anthony

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1988No. 8727SC661PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

It has long been established that a defendant in a criminal case has a right to cross-examine adverse witnesses under the sixth amendment. The scope of cross-examination, however, lies within the sound discretion of the trial court and shall not be disturbed absent abuse of that discretion. State v. Wrenn, 316 N.C. 141, 144, 340 S.E. 2d 443, 446 (1986).

Defendant contends that the trial court erred by prohibiting him from cross-examining prosecutrix about her previous accusations of sexual misconduct against her father and stepfather. Ac cording to defendant this evidence is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BaronCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. WrennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. McCarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. BassCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. State v. PutnamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API