Legal Opinion

State v. McCarroll

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 17, 1994No. 172PA93PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The first question brought to the Court by this appeal is whether it was error to exclude testimony pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 8C-1, Rule 412, which evidence would have tended to show that the prosecuting witness was not truthful when she said she had a sexual encounter with someone other than the two defendants. Rule 412 makes irrelevant certain previous sexual activity of a complainant in a rape or sex offense case. See State v. Fortney, 301 N.C. 31, 269 S.E.2d 110 (1980).

The Court of Appeals has held that Rule 412 does not prevent evidence that a complainant has falsely accused a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Milton L. McCaskillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  2. State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. FortneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. BaronCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. WalstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
  2. Roberts v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. State v. BassCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. State v. CabeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API