Legal Opinion

Joos v. Drillock

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1983No. Docket 58977PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, J.

The question presented by this appeal is whether an action for legal malpractice may be validly assigned. We hold that it may not.

Plaintiffs commenced this action alleging that defendant had committed legal malpractice during his representation of Linda Avery in a prior lawsuit. Following a bench trial, the court found in favor of defendant. Plaintiffs appeal.

On January 1, 1972, a vehicle driven by Linda Avery collided with an automobile in which Gail Joos was a passenger. Gail Joos and several other parties in the Joos vehicle filed suit in tort against Linda Avery and Mickey Avery, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Christison v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. Chaffee v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Smiley v. Manchester Insurance & Indemnity Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Joos v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. City of Detroit v. Bridgeport Brass Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Ralph W. Moores, Jr. v. Nathan Greenberg, Ralph W. Moores, Jr. v. Nathan GreenbergCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  2. Picadilly, Inc. v. RaikosIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. FosterMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Beaty v. Hertzberg & Golden, PcMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Moorhouse v. Ambassador InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API