Rios v. Nicholson
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Chief Judge.
Petitioner Rafael G. Rios appeals from an en banc decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”) dismissing Mr. Rios’s appeal on the ground that his Notice of Appeal was not timely filed under 38 U.S.C. § 7266(c). Rios v. Nicholson, 20 Vet.App. 104 (2006) (en banc). Because the Veterans Court erred by precluding Mr. Rios from relying upon the common law mailbox rule to show timely filing, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I
Mr. Rios, a U.S. veteran, originally filed a claim for disability compensation…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Midlantic National Bank v. New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Isbrandtsen Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Arnold Kyhn v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- William C. Rickett v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2010
- William Rickett v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2013
- Wolfchild v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Rafael G. Rios v. Gordon H. MansfieldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.