Legal Opinion

Wolfchild v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 25, 2011No. Nos. 03-2684L, 01-568LPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LETTOW, Judge.

This longstanding dispute between the United States (“the government”) and approximately 20,750 persons of Indian descent (collectively “plaintiffs” or “plaintiffs and plaintiff-intervenors”) involves revenue derived from lands reserved for eligible Indians. On August 18, 2011, the court directed entry of a partial final judgment under Rule 54(b) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), awarding plaintiffs and plaintiff-intervenors $673,944 for their statutory use-restriction claims. See Wolfchild v. United States, 101 Fed.Cl. 54, 91 (2011)…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fillmore Equipment of Holland, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  2. Sheldon Peters Wolfchild v. United States 03-2684l &United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  3. Kettle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. Evans v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Annamalai v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API