Legal Opinion
Lindsey v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 25, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2007-1939PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Harold C. Lindsey brings this action against the . District of Columbia (the “District”) alleging age discrimination in connection with his employment as a Canine Handler at the District of Columbia Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department (the “Fire Department”) in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-34 (2006). See Complaint ¶¶37-64. On January 13, 2012, the District filed a motion in limine arguing, among other things, that the ADEA does not grant the plaintiff the right to a jury…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lehman v. NakshianSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Latson v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- District Hospital Partners, L.P. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Nippon Shinyaku Co. v. IancuCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Dickerson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.