Wright v. Hill
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL from the Fifth District Court of New Orleans, Augustin, J.
1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.
The pendency of another suit for the same cause of action in the State of Arkansas, is no bar to the present action. Peyroux v. Davis, 17 La. 479.
Plaintiffs sue defendants for a balance of account current. The debit side of the .account is composed of five items, as follows :
1854, July 10. To cash balance per account rendered..............$9,665 19
26. “ A. G-. Tate’s account collected by you—interest
from 26th July, 1852:.............$149 12
2 years interest at 8 per cent.'....... 23 95
---- 113 61
May 31. “ paid our acceptance your draft to Whitlock, Nichols & Oo. due this date.!............$188…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Peyroux v. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
3Cited by2 opinions
- Huntington v. WesterfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- Handley v. BarrettaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938