Legal Opinion
Danziger v. Rieman
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 24, 2020No. S-19-021PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Danziger v. Rieman,
2020-Ohio-216.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SANDUSKY COUNTY Samuel R. Danziger Court of Appeals No. S-19-021 Appellant Trial Court No. 19-CV-128 v. Kendall Rieman DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellee Decided: January 24, 2020 ***** Samuel R. Danziger, pro se. Joseph R. Miller and Sarah S. Boudouris, for appellee. ***** PIETRYKOWSKI, J. {¶ 1} Appellant, Samuel Danziger, appeals two judgments of the Sandusky County Court of Common Pleas relative to his complaint for a preliminary and permanent injunction against appellee, Kendall Rieman,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Garono v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Procter Gamble Company v. StonehamOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Transamerica Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Johnson v. MorrisOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.