Legal Opinion

State v. Frank

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 3, 2002No. C1-01-1625PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STONEBURNER, Judge.

On appeal from a conviction of a second-degree controlled substance crime, appellant Anthony Lee Frank argues that (1) the district court erred as a matter of law by denying appellant’s motion to suppress evidence that the police seized during a search of appellant’s suitcase located in the trunk of the vehicle in which appellant was a passenger; (2) the police officer that stopped the vehicle, in which appellant was riding, illegally seized appellant; and (3) the taint of the illegal seizure was not removed by manifestly voluntary consent. Because the search of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Wyoming v. HoughtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. LicariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  2. State v. HardingUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. DanielsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. HardingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
  5. State v. DanielsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API